Everybody hates your project name

One of the strange things about the corporate world is the love of a project name. We create these with the stated aim of confidentiality, rather than call something what it is – we give it a “project name” so that no-one will ever know what we’re working on. The corporate halls are filled with projects named after gem stones, countries, animals, plants and pretty much any other grouping that you get taught about in kindergarten.

Don’t get me wrong, there are clearly big commercial projects and programmes that require the sort of confidentiality that comes with a project name (and normally a Non Disclosure Agreement) too. But there are also a hell of lot where it simply isn’t necessary. I’m not naive, I recognise I’m not going to change that, too many people are circling back, to move the needle on project names and sometimes taking them offline to create a win win.

You get where I’m going…

But I do want to talk about those people related changes and why your project names are bad for you, bad for employees and bad for your business. HR loves a project name, because it makes us look special, important and allows us to hold power through secrecy. We create these because it makes US feel special, but ultimately disrupts the business more than necessary and makes us look like fools.

Fresh Start!

One Team!

Fit for the Future!

Reset!

Chrysalis!

Re-vision!

(The exclamation marks aren’t necessary but whilst I write this my inner voice is taking control)

The first reason not to do is this is the names are always divisive. The people coming up with them are seldom impacted by the change other than having to implement it. Whereas the people who have their lives turned upside down due to rubbish piece of branding have to go home and tell their families that they might not be able to pay the bills because of a project named after insects transforming.

The second reason is you create a “thing”. Organisation memory lasts longer than most leaders. It is much more likely that people will remember and talk about the impact of, “Fit For The Future” rather than the time they changed the management structure. The point of a brand is to make it memorable, but on people related change you want quite the opposite – you want people to move on as soon as possible.

And the final reason is it stops you thinking about the people. When you start to measure success in relation to a project, and stop measuring it in terms of the impact of people’s lives you fulfil all the stereotypes that people have of management and leadership. Imagine you were managing Project Cause No Distress. What decisions would you make then?

Sometimes changes need to take place in organisations, that goes without saying. Our job is to implement them with as little unintentional impact as possible and to help individuals, teams and the organisation to heal and move on as quickly as possible. There’s no project name ever created, that’s additive to that.

Who are you trying to convince?

Nobody wants to work for an organisation that sucks. Well, unless you’re a vacuum engineer, in which case you don’t want to work for a company that blows.

We all want to work for a “Top Best Company Employer” (names confused to protect the innocent). And that’s lucky, because there are a number of different awards that exist to help us work out where to go, to assist us in our search, point us along the path……

Once a year the good and the great gather together to celebrate their competitive awesomeness and show just how incredibly good and best and top they absolutely are.

Which is nice.

They share it on Twitter, photos of the people that they value enough to take to the ceremony. And they celebrate – back in the workplace – disproportionately with cupcakes (much cheaper than a gala dinner ticket).

But when the metallic balloons have deflated, the cakes have gone stale and the “Celebration” chocolates (did you see what we did there?) have melted. When the PRs have issued their press statements about the CEO’s being “proud” and valuing the importance of “their people” and “their contribution”. When the attention has gone back to the sales figures, the balance sheet and personally benefiting from that contribution.

What then? What does it tell us?

Are we really proud of celebrating that as a company we don’t dump all over our employees? Is that where we’ve sunk to? That we need to have a trophy cabinet of awards in reception that show we aren’t complete and utter ba***rds?

If we are really concerned with being a good employer, why then do we need to share it with the rest of the world? Why can’t we just be one and be happy with it?

Because we want to convince people we’re not awful. Because people think we are. And truth be told, we probably know that we are too….just a little.

That’s why we make it an objective of our HR departments, we incentivise (and punish) line managers to achieve higher and better ratings, we provide incentives to employees just at the time we’re completing the surveys (purely coincidental you understand).

That’s why we systemise “being good”. Not because we believe it’s right, but because we don’t know how to do it any other way. And we shout about it, because WE need to tell you, about US.

Employees, job seekers, candidates are savvy. They don’t get fooled but marketing, by PR, by stunts or by branding. They research, they speak to people, they look at a thousand different points of data, not necessarily the ones that you want them to see.

Like the middle aged guy diving the oversized, oversized, flashy car. Hanging out awards that show how great you think you are begs the question,

“Why?”

Is it because you’re genuinely the real deal and if so, why do you need to tell me? Or, as I suspect, is it because you’re compensating for a lack of “substance”…..you know……somewhere else….